About Resource
Part of the Chicago Beyond Equity Series, this guidebook focuses on how communities and their partners can create better research that addresses community priorities. Chicago Beyond invests in community organizations that focus on developing equitable access and opportunity to young people in Chicago, Illinois. Power imbalances and inequities can bias research, limiting effective community science design, knowledge generation, and action. The guidebook is designed to "fuel community organizations, support researchers, and inspire funders." It outlines "seven inequities held in place by power," which are also "seven opportunities for change," particularly through community organizers, researchers, and funders bringing awareness to their own biases or assumptions and finding new ways to relate to community partners and other collaborators. The seven inequities and opportunities focus on: access, information, validity, ownership, value, accountability, and authorship.
How to Use
This guide is especially useful for learning how to build equity into the details and logistics of research design throughout the lifespan of a research project. The descriptions of each of the seven areas of inequity and how they hinder a true, complete picture of an issue through research are useful guiding points and areas for self-reflection. The guide focuses on:
-
- access to shaping research;
- information on what research options exist and their costs, risks, and benefits;
- opportunities for greater research validity, through recognizing communities as valid experts;
- ownership over research processes;
- assessment of what value is generated and for whom;
- authorship over the narrative; and
- accountability, through holding funders and researchers responsible for the impacts of their research.
The guidebook also details particular ideas and examples for each of its target audiences: community organizations, professional researchers, and funders. The tools for setting up a study (including options for research design such as different types of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches) are particularly helpful. The guide advises how to build in time and space for reflection, failure, and change, which is vital to the success of a collaboration and research project. It also addresses the logistics of issues such as data ownership, authorship, and other details that can emerge over the lifespan of a community science project, and that can help determine whether equity and trust are built into the practices of the research partnerships.